Part One: The Open Letter from the Two Rivers Farm concerning the revised Beelzebub Simple question: if we can change one part of Gurdjieff’s legacy, and still call it Gurdjieff, why can we […]
Read more
Part One: The Open Letter from the Two Rivers Farm concerning the revised Beelzebub Simple question: if we can change one part of Gurdjieff’s legacy, and still call it Gurdjieff, why can we […]
Read moreThis concludes the lengthy exchange. was not to be satisfied: “Well, we have the three centres, the body, the mind, and the emotional centre, but effectively, during the day the […]
Read moreWim Van Dullemen, Gurdjieff’s Movements: The Pattern of All and Everything, replublished and available in a limited edition at https://www.bythewaybooks.com/pages/books/20986/wim-van-dullemen/the-gurdjieff-movements-a-communication-of-ancient-wisdom When I say that this book is essential for anyone […]
Read morePart Two It is significant that Moore distinguishes his critique of the new teaching from any criticism of those bearing it: “These startling propositions advanced with formidable intellectual refinement by French […]
Read moreSomeone recently sent a jab in my direction, aiming not so much at what I said about “the New Work” in my book Gurdjieff: Mysticism, Contemplation, and Exercises, as about what I […]
Read moreThis continues the third question asked of Mr Adie on the evening of Wednesday 22 February 1989. The question was so long that I had to break it into two […]
Read moreThis very lengthy exchange from the meeting of 22 February 1989 has to be broken into two parts. Edward said: “Mr Adie, I was reading some books that were related […]
Read moreThis is from the meeting of Wednesday 22 February 1989. The first question was interesting only because it was asked: “Is it possible that identification is connected with my negativity?” […]
Read more